sea eagle yacht marine traffic

Bulk Carrier, IMO 9153056

• VesselFinder
• Cargo vessels

The current position of SEAEAGLE is at East Mediterranean reported 6 hours ago by AIS. The vessel is en route to the port of Mersin, Turkey , sailing at a speed of 12.0 knots and expected to arrive there on Mar 20, 04:00 . The vessel SEAEAGLE (IMO 9153056, MMSI 229364000) is a Bulk Carrier built in 1998 (26 years old) and currently sailing under the flag of Malta .

Position & Voyage Data

Map position & weather, recent port calls, vessel utilization, vessel particulars, similar vessels.

SEAEAGLE current position and history of port calls are received by AIS. Technical specifications, tonnages and management details are derived from VesselFinder database. The data is for informational purposes only and VesselFinder is not responsible for the accuracy and reliability of SEAEAGLE data.

VIDEO: Cargo vessel Sea Eagle starts listing and sinks in Turkey

by Mariska Buitendijk | Sep 22, 2022 | Maritime accidents , News , Ports , Shipping

The general cargo vessel Sea Eagle, which was moored in İskenderun Port, started to list to starboard due to imbalance in the cargo weight distribution on 18 September. Efforts to stabilise the ship were unsuccessful and its sinking could not be prevented.

According to the Turkish General Directorate of Maritime Affairs, all crew members on board were evacuated and there was no loss of life or injury. 24 containers fell into the sea and there was a small amount of fuel leakage observed, but according tot General Directorate this is under control.

Also read: Salvage of capsized splitbarge Karin Høj successful

Oil spill response

Barriers, booms and absorbent pads were placed at the time of the accident and cleaning was carried out. In addition, the fuel tanks carrying 63.5 tonnes of diesel oil were closed by divers and the oil and fuel leakage was stopped. A technical team appointed by the ship’s insurance company has started to empty the fuel tanks.

In addition, all containers that fell into the sea from the container ship have been salvaged. Watch a video of the ship starting to list as well as two extra pictures below.

The 4281-DWT Sea Eagle is a general cargo ship built in 1984. It sails under the flag of Togo. It measures 88.6 x 15.7 metres.

Pictures by the Turkish General Directorate of Maritime Affairs .

Sinking moment of the Sea Eagle in İskenderun… pic.twitter.com/mgg3VtKIMl — focuSEA (@focuseatv) September 19, 2022

Upcoming Events

Exhibition: rescuers at sea: 200 years of knrm, port conference (havenconferentie), knvts lecture: damen air cavity system (dacs) helps ships save fuel, kivi lecture for knvts members: seabed nodule collection at allseas, co2 conference, port congress rotterdam (havencongres rotterdam), international partnering forum (ipf) by the oceantic network, hydrogen conference belgium.

SWZ|Maritime articles

Curious about the articles in SWZ|Maritime? Some of them are published online. Read them here .

• LOA : 32.5m
• Power BHP : 5,630
• Bollard Pull : 70 tons
• Built : 2011, Turkey
• Fifi : Class 1

Seaeagles Leader

• LOA : 28.67m
• Power BHP : 5,000
• Bollard Pull : 60.9 tons
• Built : 2013, St.Vincent

Sea Eagles Shipping L.L.C. - Providing Marine and Offshore services to companies within the Oil and Gas sector and engineering groups.

Sea Eagles Shipping L.L.C. has been active in maritime business serving the offshore and oil industries over the last 30 years.

SES has vessels working all over the World with offshore companies operating in Middle East, Asia and Africa.

A fleet of over 50 units consisting of various sizes and types of AHTS, AHT, Tugs, Barges, Land Crafts, Crane Barge and other equipment.

1 All our vessels are manned In accordance with the National Maritime Conventions requirments and conform to the International Maritime Standards and the Classification Societies requirements at all times.

2 For our cargo clients, committed to providing the most efficient service at the most competitive prices.

In today's fast changing feeder market. Sea Eagles Shipping's strategy is set on flexibility and efficient services as well as professional customer care

3 In response to customer demand we have gradually become a strong and steady operator in the regional shipping Industry. The strength of the company's future is guaranteed by the commitment of the company directors and the support staff.

4 People at all levels in SES are responsible for leading and engaging the workforce in meeting our HSEQ objectives and targets.

All our activities performed to ensure safe, secure, healthy, high quality and environmentally sound performance.

Sea Eagles Group P.O. Box 41900 Sharjah, UAE Tel: +971 6 5260896 Fax: +971 6 5260897 [email protected]

Sea Eagles Shipping has been active in maritime business serving the offshore and oil industries over the last 30 years and has fleet of over 30 units consisting of various sizes and types of ASD Tug, Harbour Tug, AHTS, AHT, Barges, Land Crafts, Crane Barge, crew boats and other equipment.

Copyright © 2012 Sea Eagle Shipping L.L.C.

MARINE VESSEL TRAFFIC

CORONAVIRUS SHIPS

SEA EAGLE Fishing Vessel, IMO 8719504

Where is the current position of sea eagle presently vessel sea eagle is a fishing vessel sailing under the flag of unspecified . her imo number is 8719504 and mmsi number is 1. main ship particulars are length of 25 m and beam of 6 m. maps show the following voyage data - present location, next port, estimated (eta) and predicted time of arrival (pta), speed, course, draught, photos, videos, local time, utc time..

20 emails/day

Send 0 emails out of 20 today

Full Screen

Add to Fleet

Open this map on your mobile by scanning a QR code

Open this map on your mobile by scanning the QR code image with your camera

SEA EAGLE current position is received by AIS. Ship info reports, fleet analysis, company analyses, address analyses, technical specifications, tonnages, management details, addresses, classification society data and all other relevant statistics are derived from Marine Vessel Traffic database. The data is for informational purposes only and Marine Vessel Traffic is not responsible for the accuracy and reliability of data reported above herein.

• Go to navigation
• Go to content
• Go to footer
• Moscow Yacht Show 2018

The Moscow Boat Show 2018 took place from the 1st to the 3rd of June, 2018

Moscow Yacht Show 2018 , organized in the best yacht club of the Russian capital Royal Yacht Club, finished successfully. Despite the changeable weather from June 1 to 3 all three days of the exhibition were filled with events.

A lot of customers came to the show.

The following models were presented:

• Cap Camarat 7.5 DC
• Merry Fisher 695
• Merry Fisher 795
• Merry Fisher 895

Maxi-Open Mangusta Yachts presented at Boat Shows in Palm Beach and Moscow

• Inspiration

Related News

Popular news this week, popular news this month, latest news.

• Yacht Charter & Superyacht News >

Written by Zuzana Bednarova

Two important events saw the Mangusta Maxi Open by the prominent Italian builder Overmarine again protagonist on the nautical scene: Marine Max exclusive partner for the United States attended the Palm Beach Boat Show , running from March 22 to 25 with the spectacular motor yacht Mangusta 92 and the Mangusta 130 superyacht on display. Burevestnik Group, on the other hand, was the star of the Moscow International Boat Show , taking place from March 20 to 25 exhibiting the scale models of the luxury yacht Mangusta Oceano 148, the superyacht Mangusta 92, the Mangusta 165 as well as Mangusta 130 yachts.

Mangusta 92 Superyacht

MANGUSTA 92 ( an example of Mangusta 92 is the motor yacht ILLUSION ) Stylish and fast luxury motor yacht Mangusta 92 represents perfect proportions. She offers an ambitious layout that permits for 3 beautiful staterooms and a relax room or 4 staterooms, each with high-tech entertainment centers. Run by twin MTU 16V2000M94 of 2600Hp each and Kamewa 56S3 jet drives, the Mangusta 92 achieves the exciting speed of 37 knots.

Luxury motor yacht Mangusta 130

MANGUSTA 130 ( for example the charter yacht Ability ) Mangusta 130 superyacht combines pleasure and performance. Her lower deck provides 4 lovely staterooms and a salon or 5 staterooms. When the twin 3640-hp MTU16V4000 M93L are fired up and bring the vessel to a full speed of 39 knots, the peaceful as well as relaxing feeling remains, as there is no noise or vibration.

Megayacht Mangusta 165

MANGUSTA 165 ( an example can be the luxury charter yacht ZEUS ) The biggest fiberglass Open Yacht ever built, the luxury megayacht Mangusta 165 brings together state of the art technology with extreme comfort. With a speed of 39 knots, the Mangusta 165 exceeds all expectations in terms of performance, with the stabilizers that provide the smoothest ride. This majestic and elegant vessel offers extraordinarily spacious interiors with four or five staterooms and a living space.

Superyacht Mangusta Oceano 148

MANGUSTA OCEANO 148 Mangusta Oceano 148 superyacht is built to provide her Owner with the utmost in luxury and comfort aboard by integrating the latest technology processes with the most advanced marine equipment available in the market. Her interiors can be built in any kind of wood and with the style (design) selected by the Owner.

Please contact CharterWorld - the luxury yacht charter specialist - for more on superyacht news item "Maxi-Open Mangusta Yachts presented at Boat Shows in Palm Beach and Moscow".

• Charity & Fund Raising
• CharterWorld News
• Classic Yachts
• Coronavirus
• Cruise Ship
• Ecological Yachts
• Expedition Yachts
• Expert Broker Advice
• Feature Superyachts
• Interior Design
• Legal & VAT Yacht Issues
• Luxury Catamarans
• Luxury Gulet
• Luxury Phinisi
• Luxury Trimarans
• Luxury Yacht Design
• Luxury Yachts
• Marinas & Harbours
• Marine Ecology
• Marine Electronics
• Marine Equipment
• Mega Yachts
• Modern Yachts
• Motor Yachts
• New Launch Yachts
• New To Charter
• Open Style Sports Yachts
• Private Jets
• Sailing Yachts
• Social Media
• Sports Yachts
• Superyacht Crew
• Superyacht Photographers
• Superyacht Products & Supplies
• Superyacht Refits
• Superyacht Reviews
• Superyachts
• Uncategorized
• Yacht Builders
• Yacht Charter
• Yacht Charter Destinations
• Yacht Charter Picks
• Yacht Charter Specials
• Yacht Delivered to Owner
• Yacht Designers
• Yacht Events & Boat Shows
• Yacht Fashion
• Yacht Industry News
• Yacht Photos
• Yacht Racing
• Yacht Racing & Regattas
• Yacht Safety Equipment
• Yacht Support Vessels
• Yacht Tenders
• Yacht Videos
• Yachting Associations
• Yachting Awards
• Yachting Business
• Yachts For Charter
• Yachts For Sale

Quick Enquiry

Superyacht news:.

Email Your Yachting News to: news @ charterworld.com

Luxury Yachts At Events

The Caribbean

The Mediterranean

The Pacific Northwest

Successful cooperation between Overmarine Group | Mangusta and Luxury Living – FENDI Casa at FLIBS

Overmarine Group at Dusseldorf Boat Show with Mangusta 92, Mangusta 130, Mangusta 165 and Mangusta 148 Oceano Yachts on display

Eye-catching Mangusta 130 Motor Yacht HAPPY DAY spotted in Fort Lauderdale

Video introducing new mangusta 165 e superyacht moonraker.

53m support yacht FIVE OCEANS launched by Damen Yachting

News from Feadship about superyachts PROJECT 712 and PROJECT 715

35m luxury yacht MINOR FAMILY AFFAIR offering a special discount

Stunning 70m superyacht ALFA welcoming charter guests for the first time

65m Feadship superyacht PROMISE.D delivered

Discover our Top 10 brand new yachts available for charter worldwide this year

Florida charter yacht REAL SUMMERTIME offering 10% discount

Discover summer in New England aboard a luxury charter yacht: Escape to this beautiful northeast corner of the USA

Looking ahead to the 2024 MYBA Charter Show in Genoa

Westport announce the first hull of their 36m W117 range is nearing completion

Last minute yacht charter deals in the Bahamas

49m sailing yacht ANIMA MARIS is offering discounted rates for the remaining summer weeks in Croatia

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• My Account Login
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 11 March 2024

Numerical investigation of shipping noise in the Red Sea

• Rihab Larayedh 1 ,
• Bruce D. Cornuelle 2 ,
• George Krokos 3 , 4 &
• Ibrahim Hoteit 4  

Scientific Reports volume  14 , Article number:  5851 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

279 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Computational science
• Environmental impact
• Physical oceanography

Underwater noise pollution is a significant environmental issue that can have detrimental effects on marine ecosystems. One of the main sources of underwater noise pollution is ship traffic, which has been shown to negatively impact marine animals by masking communication signals and altering their behaviors. This study represents the first comprehensive analysis of underwater ship noise in the Red Sea, wherein noise maps of ships sailing through the main shipping lane in the Red Sea were simulated by integrating both anthropogenic and environmental variables. These maps offer valuable insights for policymakers, enabling them to make informed decisions and implement targeted mitigation efforts.

Similar content being viewed by others

Spatial and Temporal Variability of Ambient Underwater Sound in the Baltic Sea

Mirko Mustonen, Aleksander Klauson, … Peter Sigray

First basin scale spatial–temporal characterization of underwater sound in the Mediterranean Sea

Marta Picciulin, Antonio Petrizzo, … Michol Ghezzo

Soundscape and ambient noise levels of the Arctic waters around Greenland

Michael Ladegaard, Jamie Macaulay, … Peter Teglberg Madsen

Introduction

Underwater environments are considered as tranquil and silent habitats, but are in reality teeming with natural and biological sources of sound 1 . These include various weather events, such as thunderstorms and underwater earthquakes, and sounds produced by marine life for communication (e.g. whale and dolphin vocalizations, fish snapping or popping sounds, and crustacean stridulation). Many sea creatures rely on underwater sounds for communication and assessment of the surrounding environment, because, sound waves travel approximately five times faster than in air 2 , and vision is very limited due to optical absorption and scattering phenomena.

Increasing human activity in the ocean, including seismic exploration for oil and gas reserves, SONAR application for military exercises, commercial shipping, construction of offshore wind turbines, and sailing of cruise ships and leisure boats, affect underwater natural sounds. Since the onset of the industrial age, man-made ocean noise has continued to increase 3 , 4 . Although ships may not produce the loudest sound in the oceans, they are currently considered the most dominant and primary source of noise because of their ever increasing number. According to Statista, the global fleet of merchant ships engaged in international trade was   58,000 in 2022. Moreover, they emit signals over a wide frequency range of up to 10 kHz, but their traffic noise dominates below 500 Hz in the oceans 3 , 5 .

Underwater anthropogenic noise is thus recognized as a significant issue around the world and has detrimental effects on marine ecosystems 6 . Therefore, it must be mapped and monitored to identify areas with highest noise levels (NLs) and support decision makers to take necessary actions to reduce the impact of noise pollution on marine life. Several organizations and initiatives have already been initiated to address this issue. International Maritime Organization, the United Nations (UN) agency responsible for regulating global shipping, issued advisory guidance in 2014, specifically targeting noise emissions from commercial shipping vessels 7 . Various intergovernmental bodies such as the European Union 8 and UN 9 have taken proactive measures to address underwater noise pollution at a policy level. Additionally, various techniques, including acoustic monitoring, vessel tracking, and underwater noise modeling, have been proposed by researchers to map underwater ship noise. To this end, studies were conducted in the Eastern Mediterranean 10 , Northeast Atlantic 11 , and Slovenian Sea region 12 . In other countries, such as the USA, proactive measures have been employed to mitigate such issues. For instance, a study on underwater noise mitigation in the Santa Barbara Channel showcased dedicated efforts in this regard 13 .

Shipping-noise mapping and its integration into environmental impact assessments is well-established globally, and extensive monitoring studies are underway in several countries. Viola et al. 14 , Cafaro et al. 15 , and Pieretti et al. 16 have considerably advanced the understanding of shipping-related noise in Italy. Rako et al. 17 , Picciulin et al. 18 , and Vukadin 19 studied the impact of ship traffic in Croatia (Northern Adriatic Sea). Širovic’ and Holcer 20 explored maritime NLs in Montenegro, and researchers from Greece 21 , Slovenia 12 , 22 , and Australia 23 (the Great Barrier Reef) have focused on underwater noise. We focused on the Red Sea, a highly distinctive basin region characterized by unique physical patterns, particularly realted to temperature and salinity. The Red Sea is one of the busiest waterways in the world; therefore, investigating the ship noise in this ecologically significant area is complex.

The Red Sea is a unique marine environment and a home to houses diverse marine life. It hosts one of the longest continuous living coral reefs in the world, supporting an ecosystem involving around 350 different coral species 24 , 25 . More than 800 ships sail through the Red Sea every day, the majority of which are large vessels, including crude oil tankers and cargo ships. Despite the importance of coral reefs therein, the potential risks of such high ship traffic on its ecosystems have not yet been investigated in depth. Only a few studies have investigated the impact of underwater noise pollution on species in specific areas in the Red Sea. The impact of underwater noise on dolphins in the Gulf of Aqaba and some specific species (Lambis and Tridacna maxima) of coral reefs in the northern Red Sea has been investigated 26 , 27 . However, the spatial and temporal distributions of underwater noise in the Red Sea have not yet been investigated.

Herein, the maps of noise generated from ships along the main shipping lane in the Red Sea are generated to understand the spatiotemporal distribution of underwater shipping noise and its seasonal variation. The discipline of modeling underwater sound propagation has a long history, primarily originating from its military applications using SONAR technology. Over the years, various modeling approaches have been developed, each possessing distinct suitability based on factors such as acoustic frequency range, water depth, computational requirements, and environmental spatial variability 2 . Among these, the parabolic equation method was used herein for low-frequency predictions and complex bathymetry in shallow and deep waters 28 . However, noise map generation was computationally demanding due to significant number of noise sources and large computational domains (1 snapshot required   4480 CPU hours and two snapshots were computed per day for 2 months, resulting in a total of 124 snapshots, which amounted to 560,000 core hours). The underlying codes were optimized and the computational power of KAUST’s supercomputer, Shaheen, was leveraged to generate high-resolution maps and manage the substantial computational costs associated with the endeavor. We used an acoustic propagation model, the range-dependent acoustic model 29 , 30 , 31 , which simulates the propagation of noise from ships based on inputs of shipping traffic data, and underlying ocean conditions. These results will allow us to comprehensively understand underwater noise pollution in the Red Sea and detect areas with the highest risk for developing effective countermeasures and management strategies.

Numerous parameters have to be considered for underwater sound modeling, which vary with location, time, and environmental conditions such as sound speed, density, ship positions, bathymetry structure, and attenuation 32 .Therefore, these parameters have to be continually updated for developing a representative and effective underwater sound model.

AIS data and source modeling

AIS, a VHF-based system, facilitates message exchange among ships; AIS is mandatory for ships over 300 tons to enhance navigation and safety. Vessel positions in the Red Sea were derived from AIS data for the area with latitudes and longitudes of 10 \(^\circ\) –30 \(^\circ\) and 30 \(^\circ\) –50 \(^\circ\) , respectively, for 2 months (January and July) in 2021. Vessel density maps for the Red Sea based on historical AIS data for January and July 2021 are shown in Fig. 1 using the data provided by Global Maritime Traffic Density Service 33 . Herein, only some main vessel types were categorized, namely tankers, bulkers, container ships, open hatch vessels, and vehicle carriers.

These ships were chosen due to their dominance in the area in January and July. For example, tankers accounted for 25% of the total ship traffic. Thus, the Red Sea is a vital shipping route for tankers, particularly those involved in transporting oil products. Additionally, different carriers constituted 15% of the total ship traffic, whereas bulkers and open hatch ships collectively represented 13% of the maritime activity. Container ships constituted 9.3% of the total ship traffic, underscoring the role of the Red Sea in facilitating the global movement of goods through containerized shipping. In contrast, passenger ships constituted only 0.4% of the total ship traffic, whereas fishing vessels, including fishery patrol vessels and fishery vessels, represented   3% of the total ship traffic. These fishing vessels primarily operate near shore.

A map of Red Sea shipping traffic density as a fraction of total time per square km (color) for ( a ) January 2021 and ( b ) July 2021 33 . Map produced using Matlab R2023a ( https://www.mathworks.com ).

A moving ship produces noise at various frequencies and levels from propeller cavitation, engine and hull vibrations, and bow wave. Among these, propellers are the main source of noise 34 . The features of the noise generated depend on factors such as the ship’s type, design, construction, maintenance status, and navigation conditions (e.g., speed and load). The sound produced in a specific direction can be characterized by the spectral density of the source level (SL), which is a function of frequency (known as the acoustic signature) and is measured in dB re 1 \(\upmu\) Pa \(^{2}\) m \(^{2}\) /Hz.

SLs for ships must be accurately determined to predict sound propagation in the marine environment as errors in SL can impact the acoustic field. However, this process is expensive and complex; therefore, approximations are commonly used. Herein, we used a spectrum model, JOMOPANS-ECHO 35 , developed in response to specific requirements for marine acoustic mapping. It addresses some limitations of pre-existing models such as RANDI1.3 35 and WH02 35

Equation ( 1 ) expresses the source spectral density level, denoted as \(L_{s_f \mathrm {~J}-\textrm{E}}(f, V, l, C)\) , containing variables such as frequency ( \(f\) ), ship speed ( \(V\) ), ship length ( \(l\) ), vessel class ( \(C\) ), and reference length ( \(l_0=91.44\,\text {m}\) ). The reference spectrum per vessel \(L_{S_{f, 0}}(f, C)\) , is given as follow 35 :

where \(K=191\) dB and \(D=3\) ( note that \(D_{\text {cruise vessel}} = 4\) ) . The variables include normalized frequency ( \(\widehat{f}=f/f_{\text {ref}}\) ) and normalized frequency based on reference speed ( \(\widehat{f}_1=480 \ \text {Hz} \times (V_{\text {ref}}/V_C\) )), where reference frequency is 1 Hz and reference speed is equal to 1 kn. As large vessels such as container ships, vehicle carriers, bulkers, and tankers are targeted herein at frequencies below 100 Hz, an additional peak is introduced 35 :

where \(K^{LF} = 208\) dB and \(D^{LF} = 0.8\) for container ships and bulkers and \(D^{LF}= 1\) for vehicle carriers and tankers. The normalized frequency based on reference speed ( \(\widehat{f}_1^{LF}=600 \,\text {Hz} \times (V_{\text {ref}}/V_C)\) ) is also introduced. The SL in the decidecade frequency bands is converted by adding \(10 \log _{10}(0.231 \widehat{f}) \,\textrm{dB}\) .

The ship types considered herein were further categorized into four main types for in-depth analysis, as shown in Table 1 :

The ship characteristics (Table 1 ) are input to the reference spectrum model used for estimating the SLs of marine shipping (Fig. 2 ), as detailed in an article by MacGillivray and de Jong 35 . The reference speed ( \(V_c\) ) is adopted from their study, with a source depth of 6 meters. In addition, effective ship speed was calculated by averaging the speeds of moving vessels in each category observed in the Red Sea during January and July. The effective ship length was categorized into three ranges: 100–200, 200–300, and >300 m. Vessels with lengths of < 100 m were eliminated because only 7.5% of ships in the dataset were < 100 m long.

Predicted source levels using data from Table 1 for four main ship categories: (C1) tankers, (C2) container ships, (C3) vehicle carriers, and (C4) bulkers. The ship categories are further delineated by length ranges: ( a ) 100–200 m, ( b ) 200–300 m, and ( c ) > 300 m, each representing a distinct subset within the specified category. The propagation calculations are constrained to the highlighted frequency band (40–100 Hz),where the expected mix of ships exhibits the highest power.

Environmental parameters

Sea bottom topography is crucial for sound wave propagation. The interaction of acoustic waves with the seafloor includes wave scattering, transmission, and reflection. The bathymetry data used for the modeling are shown in Fig. 3 a, which were obtained from the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans digital atlas in 30-arc-second intervals. The data show that the Red Sea is not an ultradeep basin and comprises 45% shallow waters (< 300 m), 52% mid-waters (300–1500 m), and only 3% deep waters (> 1500 m) (Fig. 3 a).

( a ) Bathymetric data used in this study, where colors show the depth in meters. The red line indicates the section corresponding to the subsequent figures ( b ) Seafloor sediment characteristics (colors show sediment type). Map was produced using Matlab R2023a ( https://www.mathworks.com ).

The propagation of sound waves is influenced by ocean depth, topography, and sediment characteristics. To accurately integrate these data into the model, reliable data on seafloor properties must be obtained. However, obtaining such data can be challenging, particularly in basins such as the Red Sea with limited sedimentological information.

The sediment types in the area were determined from the geological and geomorphological maps from the scientific literature to estimate the relevant coefficients for sound propagation models. The modeling parameters, such as sound speed ( \(C_{b}\) in m/s), density in sediments ( \(\rho _{b}\) in g/cc), and attenuation in sediments ( \(\alpha\) in dB/wavelength), were determined based on the fundamental principles of geoacoustic properties 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 . These references describe the fundamental principles, measurement techniques, and practical examples of seafloor materials across various oceanic environments, providing a comprehensive overview of seafloor acoustic properties. The geoacoustic properties were based on a map produced by the French Hydrographic and Oceanographic Service 40 . Figure 3 b shows that mud and sand accounted for 82% of the seafloor composition, whereas rock and other sediments (e.g., silt and gravel) accounted for 14% and 4%, respectively. The seafloor model used herein was a semi-infinite, homogeneous medium without shear, consistent with the geological and geomorphological information obtained from the existing maps.

Coming to the sound speed computations, there are multiple formulas to calculate sound speed and such formulas may be found in oceanographic textbooks. Here, we adopted the Del Grosso-Mackenzie formula 41 . The sound speed profiles in the Red Sea were obtained from the daily averaged profiles of temperature and salinity using a high-resolution (1 km) general oceanic circulation model. The high-resolution dataset was simulated by a regionally tuned and extensively validated configuration of the MIT general circulation model (MITgcm) 42 , covering the entire Red Sea basin and the adjacent Gulfs, namely the Gulf of Suez, the Gulf of Aqaba, and the Gulf of Aden 43 . The model implemented with 50 vertical layers, the vertical resolution varied from 4 m at the surface to 300 m at the bottom. The model output was previously used for various studies on the Red Sea and successfully described the circulation dynamics ranging from large-scale overturning circulation 44 , 45 to vigorous mesoscale eddy activity 46 , 47 . This model accurately reproduced the seasonality and structure of the upper mixed layers and the depth of the thermocline in the Red Sea 43 , 48 .

Figure 4 shows the spatial contrast in sound speed profiles spanning a distance of 1000 km across the Red Sea for 1 day in summer and 1 day in winter. These fluctuations in sound speed predominantly resulted from temperature variations. Figure 4 a shows a surface duct due to minimum sound speed near the water surface. Figure 4 b shows the sound speed profile in summer that does not show a near-surface duct. The black line shows bottom topography in both the plots.

Spatial and temporal variability of sound speed profiles in the Red Sea, in meters per second (color), along the section highlighted in Fig. 3 a, with the source and receiver located in the southern and northern Red Sea, respectively. The black line shows bottom topography (resolution: 5 km).

Acoustic field computation

Some parameters are set beforehand for computing acoustics based on the specific scenario being modeled. For example, the vertical resolution was set to 1 m herein for investigating the propagation of sound in the vertical dimension. The depth of the ocean floor and the number of sediment layers, which vary with depth, affect the propagation distance in the vertical plane. A distance of 1 km was chosen for the horizontal resolution based on the data obtained from the general oceanic circulation model of the Red Sea, which provides daily profiles for salinity and temperature with a resolution of 1 km. Additionally, the bathymetry data used for the analysis also had a resolution of 1 km. Each source had different transmission frequencies that must be taken into consideration in the model. Computations were performed in a narrow frequency band ranging from 40 to 100 Hz using 1-Hz bins. Computations were performed across 61 discrete frequencies.

To compute acoustic propagation, the input variables that need to be specified include the location of ships in the region and their specifications along with other relevant environmental factors and the locations of all receivers, where the sound pressure levels (SPLs) are calculated. The 2D \(\times\) N method was used 49 , 50 , 51 to compute the acoustic field. Owing to the high computing capacity provided by the KAUST supercomputer, Shaheen, a high azimuth angular resolution of 0.57 \(^\circ\) was used. Such a high angular resolution considerably enhances the resolution of the results, allowing for a more precise analysis of sound propagation dynamics in the region but at the expense of increased computation time and requirement of a powerful computing system.

Each source emits sound with a specific maximum propagation distance, \(R_{max}\) , a parameter often assumed in the context of the horizontal plane, referred to as the radius of the propagation disk. However, the maximum range is not a fixed constant but varies based on specific circumstances and the particular sources involved. Given that the majority of ships navigate through the main shipping lane of the Red Sea, a distance of 150 km or less is typically used. This limitation arises due to two primary reasons. First, beyond this distance, sound reaches the land as the Red Sea width is approximately 300 km. Second, other ships (sources) may be present within this range, further emphasizing the importance of considering the dominance of louder sounds in the surrounding maritime environment. Based on the environmental input the propagation loss ( PL ) information on sound attenuation was generated as the sound propagated through water.

For each frequency ( f ), the SL corresponding to each ship ( i ) is selected and combined with the PL to determine the spectral power at that frequency for each receiver range (r) by integrating the spectral density power as follows:

in accordance with the definitions outlined in ISO 18405, \(F_{P}\) represents the propagation factor for PL, while \(F_{S}\) represents the source factor relating to SL. After obtaining the spectral power at each frequency for all receiver positions, the total NL for each cell is calculated by adding the spectral powers of all ships that contribute to the NL at that cell. The concept of closest neighborhood is applied during the conversion from radial (r) to cell ( x ,  y ). Notably, when multiple points contribute to the acoustic information in a given cell the model takes the average of those points.

Seasonal distribution of ship noise propagation

Figure 5 displays the PL computed at a frequency of 90 Hz along a path in the Red Sea, originating from a source depth of 40 m. Notably, the graph reveals a distinct seasonal trend in PL. In January (Fig. 5 a,e), PL is particularly lower near the surface, indicating less acoustic attenuation, resulting in a PL of 50–60 dB at approximately 200 km (Fig. 5 a). The surface duct allows the sound to be trapped in a region close to the surface before interacting with the bottom layer, resulting in the observed characteristics.

Daily propagation loss (PL) computed along the same path as Fig. 4 at a frequency of 90 Hz and source depth of 40 m from: ( a ) January 15th, ( b ) July 15th, ( c ) January 17th , ( d ) July 17th, ( e ) January 30th, and ( f ) July 30th. Colors indicate PL.

In contrast, the PL substantially increases near the surface in July (Fig. 5 b,f), indicating higher attenuation along this identical section of the path. This difference is attributed to the varying sound speed profiles between January and July, corresponding to the winter and summer seasons respectively, particularly the presence of surface duct during winter. The downward-refracting sound speed profile typically results in a consistent energy loss into the bottom, except for instances wherein a duct is present near the surface. This possibly plays a vital role in explaining the variations between winter and summer, although these distinctions may not be particularly pronounced. Figure 5 c,d show a small difference between months as the surface duct is less important.

Spatial distribution of ship noise propagation

To assess spatial variability, instantaneous ship noise maps were produced daily for January and July. Figure 6 shows the predicted spectral NL ( dB re \(1\,\upmu \text {Pa}^{2}\) /Hz) distribution on January 11, 2021, at six depths. The maps show a peak in ship NLs in the northern part of the Red Sea at different depths, with the highest levels at 10 and 30 m (Fig. 6 c,d) and the lowest levels at 75 m (Fig. 6 f).

Predicted spectral noise level ( dB re \(1\,\upmu \,\text { Pa}^{2}\) /Hz) distribution, represented by colors, on 11 January 2021 in the Red Sea averaged over the frequency band: 40–100 Hz at depths of ( a ) 3 m, ( b ) 6 m, ( c ) 10 m, ( d ) 30 m, ( e ) 50 m, and ( f ) 75 m. Map was produced using Matlab R2023a ( https://www.mathworks.com ).

The observed patterns in the generated maps were consistently distinct. In Fig. 6 , the sound intensity is relatively low near the surface, reaches its highest level at depths of 10–50 m, and decreases as the depth increases. Spatially, the SPL is notably higher within the main shipping channels, exceeding 120 dB, due to intense maritime activities. Moreover, unevenly distributed NLs were observed in the Red Sea due to a combination of factors. First, bathymetric features, such as extensive shallow banks, numerous islands, and coral reefs, acted as barriers that impeded sound propagation and created shadows, thereby protecting the coasts from noise generated by ships. Additionally, the limited routes for ship traffic, which is concentrated in the main shipping lane, contribute to lower NLs in the southern region. Conversely, the northern side of the shipping channels experiences elevated NLs primarily due to bathymetry and the accessibility of ports, leading to increased vessel activity and noise.

The phenomenon of elevated NLs in shallow water areas, such as those situated near the Suez Canal or the Sudan port, is an interesting subject. These regions, due to their proximity to major shipping routes, experience high levels of noise. The Suez Canal known for its strategic significance as a vital maritime passage connecting the Mediterranean Sea and Red Sea, attracts a substantial amount of shipping traffic. A separate study focusing on the Eastern Mediterranean region further supports this observation, substantiating the presence of high NLs in the shallow region of the Suez Canal 10 . An additional figure has been added to the Supplementary Material (Fig. S2 ), featuring the sound pressure level for the 63 Hz decade band. This addition aligns with the prescribed indicator for continuous underwater sound as delineated in the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive.

Noise level exceedance

The NL exceedance, which indicates how often a specific sound pressure level is exceeded, is valuable for understanding the persistent extreme NLs experienced by marine organisms. It can be represented as a percentile of an SPL time-series, where a certain value is surpassed by a certain percentage of observations. Figure 7 shows the NL exceedance for the entire combined duration of January and July, with two daily observations for each of the 2 months. The figure shows results for both months because the modeled results exhibited very similar graphical information for both months. The SPL metrics namely \(L_{10}\) , \(L_{50}\) , and \(L_{90}\) , provide insights into the probability of sound intensity in noise environments. \(L_{10}\) indicates that noise exceeds this threshold for 10% of the time. Conversely, \(L_{50}\) represents the level surpassed for 50% of the time, making it the statistical midpoint of noise readings and reflecting the central tendency of noise distribution. In contrast, \(L_{90}\) represents the level exceeded for 90% of the time, indicating that noise is above this threshold for the majority of cases. This relationship illustrates the progression of SPLs from baseline levels ( \(L_{90}\) ) to more intermittent occurrences ( \(L_{50}\) ) and further to extreme events ( \(L_{10}\) ) based on the modeling of ship noise events. In the southern regions, underwater topography plays a crucial role in reducing noise and prevents the noise from reaching coral reefs edges. Conversely, NLs are considerably higher in and around port areas. A significant distinction between the density maps in Figs. 1 and 7 is the representation of sound propagation.

Median predicted spectral noise level ( dB re \(1\,\upmu \, \text {Pa}^{2}\) /Hz) color distributions in the Red Sea at the depth of 12 m, averaged over the frequency band (40–100 Hz) for 3 quantities over the months January and July, 2021. ( a ) \(L_{10}\) , ( b ) \(L_{50}\) , and ( c ) \(L_{90}\) . Map produced using Matlab R2023a ( https://www.mathworks.com ).

While the information about the validation and calibration of the developed mapping model is limited, these noise maps present a preliminary resource for tracking trends in shipping NLs. A comparative analysis of the existing studies reveals compelling patterns 10 , 12 , 52 . Notably, a correlation exists between ship density and sound distribution on the map, with high concentrations observed in areas with high maritime traffic. The map further shows that sound attenuates as it approaches coastlines. Compared with northeast Atlantic 11 , where ships tend to hug the coasts, the Red Sea area is unique because shipping lanes traverse in this narrow expanse, resulting in a distinct soundscape. The narrow geography of the Red Sea, which is approximately 300-km wide allows sound to reach the coastlines as ships navigate through its central axis. Despite lacking formal validation, these consistent observations, coupled with the unique characteristics of the Red Sea, strengthen the tool’s utility for preliminary assessments and managerial insights.

Herein, the impact of ship traffic on underwater noise pollution in the Red Sea is investigated by generating representative maps of NLs in January and July. The findings of this study are important for policymakers and marine resource managers as the generated maps will provide valuable insights into the spatial and temporal distribution of ship noise in the region. The underwater noise level threshold that is harmful for marine organisms has not been agreed upon yet because it depends on various factors such as the frequency of noise and the type of marine life; however, numerous studies have shed light on its potential detrimental effects.

The results of the study provide insights into the distribution and intensity of ship noise in the Red Sea, focusing on the factors that influence its variability across different regions. One of the key findings is that the northern Red Sea experiences the highest ship NLs, particularly in areas close to the Suez Canal. The bathymetric characteristics of the Red Sea also play a crucial role in shaping the distribution of ship noise. The Red Sea has extended shallow regions along its coast; therefore, NLs are significantly attenuated in these near-surface depths. However, NLs increase with depth, reaching higher values in shallow and intermediate depths, and decrease as the depth increases. This complex pattern can be attributed to the interplay between factors such as temperature, pressure, and the bathymetric features of the region.

The noise maps reveal an interesting division of the Red Sea into eastern and western parts, distinguished by a peak in NL along its axis. This peak is directly associated with the main shipping lanes. Areas with high ship traffic, such as the coastal regions of Jeddah and Port Sudan, exhibit elevated NLs due to the continuous flow of vessels in these regions. In contrast, the southern Red Sea (SRS) regions, including areas such as Dahlak and Farasan, experience lower NLs because of the presence of islands and coral reefs that create shadows and reduce noise propagation near the coastal regions. Additionally, the subsequent restriction of shipping lanes to a narrow corridor in these areas contributes to the lower NLs in the SRS. However, a noteworthy exception to this trend is observed in the Suez region. Despite its shallow depths, NLs are notably high in this narrow Gulf. The sound sources, from the concentrated ship traffic passing through the Suez Canal region, produces the elevated NLs in this area.

Seasonal variations in ship noise propagation were also evident in the study, with higher NLs observed during winter compared to summer. These fluctuations may be influenced by factors such as weather conditions and changes in shipping activity as well as sound speed, mainly near the surface.

The findings of this study have significant implications for marine conservation and management efforts in the Red Sea. The identification of areas with high noise levels and an understanding of the factors influencing their variation provide a foundation for developing effective mitigation strategies. By implementing measures to minimize ship noise, such as regulating vessel routes and promoting the adoption of quieter propulsion systems, the negative impacts of noise pollution on marine species that heavily rely on sound for communication, navigation, and feeding can be mitigated. In addition, the interconnection between species in the Red Sea 53 implies that future connectivity studies would greatly benefit from the incorporation of underwater sounds. By incorporating acoustic data into such investigations, the complex interactions and communication mechanisms among Red Sea organisms can be comprehensively elucidated.

However, significant knowledge gaps remain in the accuracy and validity of data used in our underwater modeling. Specifically, there is a scarcity of detailed data on the geoacoustic parameters of the deep layers of the Red Sea. The complex seafloor topography and variability of the ocean environment can also pose challenges in accurately modeling acoustic propagation. A ship’s propellers, hull, and other machinery further contribute to its sound signature. Additionally, the type and frequency of the sound emitted by a ship may vary depending on its operational conditions such as the vessel’s speed and water conditions. These limitations can result in approximations and constrain the models’ ability accurately simulate acoustic propagation in the region. In addition, the need for noise measurements and further calibration of the model should be underscored.

Despite these inherited uncertainties, this study is the first to investigate NLs in the Red Sea. While there may be some margin of uncertainty in terms of decibels, the results of this study serve as an essential starting point for further discussion on this topic and as a benchmark for future research. It underscores the need for more detailed investigations in specific regions, such as port areas and those close to the Suez Canal, where NLs are the highest. Moreover, it focuses on seafloor topography and related factors in terms of the physical characteristics of the ocean floor, such as the depth, contours, and composition. This work provides an invaluable overview of the coral reef areas at risk due to underwater noise, guiding ocean sampling efforts and conservation strategies. This information is essential for protecting the delicate ecosystems of the Red Sea and ensuring the long-term health of its marine biodiversity.

Data availability

Data is available on request from the authors. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (I.H), upon reasonable request.

Merchant, N. et al. Measuring acoustic habitats. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6 , 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12330 (2015).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Jensen, F. B., Kuperman, W. A., Porter, M. B., Schmidt, H. & Tolstoy, A. Computational Ocean Acoustics Vol. 2011 (Springer, 2011).

Book   Google Scholar  

Hildebrand, J. A. Anthropogenic and natural sources of ambient noise in the ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 395 , 5–20. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08353 (2009).

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

Noaa fisheries: Ocean noise. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/science-data/ocean-noise . Accessed 15 Jan 2023.

Wenz, G. M. Acoustic ambient noise in the ocean: Spectra and sources. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34 , 1936–1956. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1909155 (1962).

Duarte, C. M. et al. The soundscape of the anthropocene ocean. Science 371 , eaba4658. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba4658 (2021).

Article   PubMed   CAS   Google Scholar  

IMO, M. Guidelines for the reduction of underwater noise from commercial shipping to address adverse impacts on marine life. https://doi.org/10.3397/nc-2022-678 (2014).

Commission, E. Commission decision (EU) 2017/848 of 17 May 2017 laying down criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters and specifications and standardised methods for monitoring and assessment, and repealing decision 2010/477/EU. Off. J. Eur. Union L 125 , 43–74 (2017).

Google Scholar  

United Nations. Nineteenth meeting of the united nations: Open-ended informal consultative process on oceans and the law of the sea: Anthropogenic underwater noise: New york (Anthropogenic underwater noise, In Nineteenth meeting, 2018).

Skarsoulis, E., Piperakis, G., Orfanakis, E., Papadakis, P. & Taroudakis, M. Modelling of underwater noise due to ship traffic in the eastern mediterranean sea. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Underwater Acoustics, Skiathos, Greece , 3–8 (2017).

Farcas, A., Powell, C. F., Brookes, K. L. & Merchant, N. D. Validated shipping noise maps of the northeast Atlantic. Sci. Total Environ. 735 , 139509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139509 (2020).

Article   ADS   PubMed   CAS   Google Scholar  

Popit, A. & Čurović, L. Modeling underwater noise levels in the Slovenian sea. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 31 , 3755–3765. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/147132 (2022).

Article   Google Scholar  

ZoBell, V. M. et al. Underwater noise mitigation in the Santa Barbara channel through incentive-based vessel speed reduction. Sci. Rep. 11 , 18391. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96506-1 (2021).

Article   ADS   PubMed   PubMed Central   CAS   Google Scholar  

Viola, S. et al. Continuous monitoring of noise levels in the gulf of Catania (Ionian sea) study of correlation with ship traffic. Mari. Pollut. Bull. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.05.040 (2017).

Cafaro, V. et al. Underwater noise assessment outside harbor areas: The case of port of Civitavecchia, Northern Tyrrhenian sea, Italy. Mar. Pollut. Bull. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.06.058 (2018).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Pieretti, N. et al. Anthropogenic noise and biological sounds in a heavily industrialized coastal area (gulf of Naples, Mediterranean sea). Mar. Environ. Res. 159 , 105002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.105002 (2020).

Rako, N., Picciulin, M., Vilibić, I. & Fortuna, C. M. Spatial and temporal variability of sea ambient noise as an anthropogenic pressure index: The case of the Cres-lošinj archipelago, Croatia. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 93 , 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315412001233 (2013).

Picciulin, M. et al. Are the 1/3-octave band 63-and 125-Hz noise levels predictive of vessel activity? The case in the Cres–Lošinj archipelago (Northern Adriatic sea, Croatia). In The Effects of Noise on Aquatic life II , 821–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_101 (Springer, 2016).

Vukadin, P. Underwater noise monitoring experiences in Croatia. In Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics . https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000263 (AIP Publishing 2016).

Širović, A. & Holcer, D. Ambient noise from seismic surveys in the southern Adriatic sea. Montenegrin Adriatic Coast Mar. Biol. . https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2020_710 (2021).

Prospathopoulos, A., Kassis, D., Anagnostou, M., Pagou, K. & Panayotidis, P. Monitoring underwater noise in Greek waters: Key issues in implementing the EU marine strategy framework directive. In Proceedings of the UACE2017-4t h Underwater Acoustics Conference and Exhibition , 3–8 (2017).

Merchant, N. D. et al. A decade of underwater noise research in support of the European marine strategy framework directive. Ocean Coastal Manage. 228 , 106299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106299 (2022).

MacGillivray, A. et al. Modelling underwater shipping noise in the great barrier reef marine park using AIS vessel track data. In Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference International Noise (2014).

Carvalho, S., Kürten, B., Krokos, G., Hoteit, I. & Ellis, J. The Red Sea. In World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation , 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100853-9.00004-X (Elsevier, 2019).

Egypt launches pilot project to restore red sea coral reefs. https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2022/09/egypt-launches-pilot-project-restore-red-sea-coral-reefs . Accessed 20 Jan 2023.

Van Der Woude, S. Assessing effects of an acoustic marine geophysical survey on the behaviour of bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus . Bioacoustics 17 , 188–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2008.9753812 (2008).

Havlik, M.-N. Effect of Anthropogenic Noise on Reef Macroinvertebrates (Lambis lambis and Tridacna maxima) . Ph.D. thesis, KAUST (2020).

Etter, P. C. Advanced applications for underwater acoustic modeling. Adv. Acoust. Vib. 2012 , 25 (2012).

Collins (22008-2015). ram parabolic equation code, matlab style. http://staff.washington.edu/dushaw/AcousticsCode/RamMatlabCode.html . Accessed 20 Oct 2022.

Collins, M. D. A split-step padé solution for the parabolic equation method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93 , 1736–1742. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.406739 (1993).

Collins, M. D. A self-starter for the parabolic equation method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92 , 2069–2074. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.405258 (1992).

Farcas, A., Thompson, P. M. & Merchant, N. D. Underwater noise modelling for environmental impact assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 57 , 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.012 (2016).

Global maritime traffic. https://globalmaritimetraffic.org/index.html . Accessed 20 Mar 2023.

Leaper, R., Renilson, M. & Ryan, C. Reducing underwater noise from large commercial ships: Current status and future directions. J. Ocean Technol. 9 , 25 (2014).

MacGillivray, A. & de Jong, C. A reference spectrum model for estimating source levels of marine shipping based on automated identification system data. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 9 , 369. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9040369 (2021).

Hamilton, E. L. Geoacoustic modeling of the sea floor. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68 , 1313–1340. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.385100 (1980).

Lara-S’aenz, A. & Ranz-Guerra, C.C.-F.C. Acoustic properties of sediments. Acoust. Ocean Bottom 20 , 3–58 (1987).

Zhou, J.-X., Zhang, X.-Z. & Knobles, D. Low-frequency geoacoustic model for the effective properties of sandy seabottoms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125 , 2847–2866. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3089218 (2009).

Article   ADS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Jackson, D. R. & Richardson, M. High-Frequency Seafloor Acoustics (Springer, 2007).

Marine sedimentology. https://data.shom.fr/ . Accessed 15 Mar 2023.

Mackenzie, K. V. Nine-term equation for sound speed in the oceans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70 , 807–812. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.386920 (1981).

Marshall, J., Adcroft, A., Hill, C., Perelman, L. & Heisey, C. A finite-volume, incompressible Navier stokes model for studies of the ocean on parallel computers. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 102 , 5753–5766. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jc02775 (1997).

Krokos, G., Cerovečki, I., Zhan, P., Hendershott, M. & Hoteit, I. Seasonal variability of red sea mixed layer depth: The influence of atmospheric buoyancy and momentum forcing. Front. Mar. Sci. 20 , 20 (2024).

Yao, F. et al. Seasonal overturning circulation in the red sea: 1. Model validation and summer circulation. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 119 , 2238–2262. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jc009004 (2014).

Yao, F. et al. Seasonal overturning circulation in the red sea: 2. Winter circulation. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 119 , 2263–2289. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jc009331 (2014).

Zhan, P., Subramanian, A. C., Yao, F. & Hoteit, I. Eddies in the red sea: A statistical and dynamical study. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 119 , 3909–3925. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jc009563 (2014).

Zhan, P. et al. The eddy kinetic energy budget in the red sea. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 121 , 4732–4747. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jc011589 (2016).

Krokos, G., Cerovečki, I., Papadopoulos, V. P., Hendershott, M. & Hoteit, I. Processes governing the seasonal evolution of mixed layers in the red sea. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 127 , e2021JC017369. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021jc017369 (2022).

Oliveira, T., Lin, Y. & Porter, M. Underwater sound propagation modeling in a complex shallow water environment. Front. Mar. Sci 8 , 751327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.751327 (2021).

DiNapoli, F. & Deavenport, R. L. Numerical Models of Underwater Acoustic Propagation. Ocean Acoustics 79–157 (Springer, 1979).

Lee, D., Pao, Y., Schultz, M. & Teng, Y. Modeling the effects of azimuthal coupling on acoustic propagation. Theoret. Comput. Acoust. 95 , 115 (1996).

Putland, R., de Jong, C., Binnerts, B., Farcas, A. & Merchant, N. Multi-site validation of shipping noise maps using field measurements. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 179 , 113733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113733 (2022).

Wang, Y., Raitsos, D. E., Krokos, G., Zhan, P. & Hoteit, I. A Lagrangian model-based physical connectivity atlas of the red sea coral reefs. Front. Mar. Sci. 9 , 925491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.925491 (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the office of the vice president of Research at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) under the virtual Red Sea Initiative ( /#REP/1/3268-01-01). The authors would like to thank Dr.Matt Dzieciuch for graciously sharing his Matlab RAM code. All computations were conducted on the KAUST supercomputer facilities Shaheen.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, 23955, Saudi Arabia

Rihab Larayedh

Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA

Bruce D. Cornuelle

Institute of Oceanography, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, 19013, Anavyssos, Greece

George Krokos

Physical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, 23955, Saudi Arabia

George Krokos & Ibrahim Hoteit

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

R.L. conducted the experiments, wrote the manuscript text, and prepared figures, R.L. and G.K. collected data, R.L., G.K., B.D.C., and I.H. designed the study, performed the analysis, and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim Hoteit .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information., rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Larayedh, R., Cornuelle, B.D., Krokos, G. et al. Numerical investigation of shipping noise in the Red Sea. Sci Rep 14 , 5851 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56523-2

Download citation

Received : 31 October 2023

Accepted : 07 March 2024

Published : 11 March 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56523-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Underwater shipping noise
• Propagation modelling

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Posted 2024-03-18 18:48

Contact Information:

Sea Eagle Inflatable Boat Model SE9H - $280 (Plano, TX)

QR Code Link to This Post

post id: 7728540706

posted: 2024-03-18 18:48

♥ best of [ ? ]

refresh the page.

Sea Eagle Inflatable Boat Model SE9H - boats - by owner - marine...

Boat in very good condition, no leak, Motor-Guide trolling motor 35LB with mounting kit TX number registered $280 OBO, Cash only

First refuelling for Russia’s Akademik Lomonosov floating NPP

!{Model.Description}

The FNPP includes two KLT-40S reactor units. In such reactors, nuclear fuel is not replaced in the same way as in standard NPPs – partial replacement of fuel once every 12-18 months. Instead, once every few years the entire reactor core is replaced with and a full load of fresh fuel.

The KLT-40S reactor cores have a number of advantages compared with standard NPPs. For the first time, a cassette core was used, which made it possible to increase the fuel cycle to 3-3.5 years before refuelling, and also reduce by one and a half times the fuel component in the cost of the electricity produced. The operating experience of the FNPP provided the basis for the design of the new series of nuclear icebreaker reactors (series 22220). Currently, three such icebreakers have been launched.

The Akademik Lomonosov was connected to the power grid in December 2019, and put into commercial operation in May 2020.

Electricity generation from the FNPP at the end of 2023 amounted to 194 GWh. The population of Pevek is just over 4,000 people. However, the plant can potentially provide electricity to a city with a population of up to 100,000. The FNPP solved two problems. Firstly, it replaced the retiring capacities of the Bilibino Nuclear Power Plant, which has been operating since 1974, as well as the Chaunskaya Thermal Power Plant, which is more than 70 years old. It also supplies power to the main mining enterprises located in western Chukotka. In September, a 490 km 110 kilovolt power transmission line was put into operation connecting Pevek and Bilibino.

Image courtesy of TVEL

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy Policy
• Newsletter sign up
• Digital Edition
• Editorial Standards